Amazon Kindle Fire 1 (5GB + 16GB) Análisis | 168 Datos comparados

The Kindle Fire is a 7-inch media tablet serving as an affordable, $199 gateway to Amazon’s ecosystem, ideal for consumption rather than professional use. Key advantages include seamless content integration, a highly portable form factor, and a compact design that surpasses the iPad for single-handed, comfortable reading. However, the device acts as a "closed garden" and faces limitations, including a sluggish user interface, lack of a camera or microphone, and limited internal storage. While the Amazon Silk browser aims to improve speed, it sometimes struggles with complex Java-based websites. Ultimately, the device is positioned as an "excellent media tablet" that sacrifices high-end specs for substance and ease of use, appealing primarily to those deep within the Amazon platform. The 2011 review highlights the device as a strategic, well-built entry-level product designed for content consumption. For more details, visit TechCrunch.

The 2011 CNET review of the original Amazon Kindle Fire (7-inch) highlights a groundbreaking $199 media tablet that prioritizes Amazon's content ecosystem over high-end hardware specifications. It is described as a "sleek if never sexy" device featuring a simple, user-friendly interface designed for seamless consumption of music, video, and apps. Key pros include an impressive, vibrant 7-inch display with 169ppi, a fast 1GHz dual-core processor capable of smooth 2D/3D gaming, and a durable, soft-touch design. The operating system is praised for its attractive, intuitive navigation, making media management straightforward. Conversely, the device suffers from significant hardware omissions to maintain its low price point, lacking a camera, microphone, GPS, Bluetooth, and HDMI connectivity. Furthermore, it is deemed heavy for long-term reading compared to E-ink alternatives and offers only average web browsing, while the curated Amazon Appstore is limited compared to the full Android Market.

The Popzara review of the original Amazon Kindle Fire ($199) highlights the tablet as a budget-friendly, "no-nonsense" portal for media consumption and Amazon's ecosystem, particularly for Prime members. Key pros include a vibrant 7-inch IPS display, simple user interface, and seamless integration with Amazon Cloud Storage to manage the limited 8GB of internal memory. However, the review notes significant cons, such as the absence of a camera, microphone, and GPS, along with performance limitations like a lack of multitasking capabilities. For more details, visit Popzara.

Business Insider’s 2011 review described the original $199 Kindle Fire as a high-value "nice try" that succeeded as a media consumption device for the Amazon ecosystem but fell short of the iPad's capabilities. Key pros included a solid build, a bright, responsive IPS display, and all-day battery life. However, significant cons included a sluggish, jittery browser, lack of physical navigation buttons, noticeable heat issues during use, and missing hardware like a camera or volume buttons.

The Kindle Fire impresses with a sturdy build, a vibrant 7-inch IPS display, and a highly competitive sub-£130 price point, though it lacks physical volume buttons and the screen is prone to fingerprints. Its custom Android interface, featuring a "carousel" for content, is generally intuitive, yet the dual-core processor experiences occasional lag and stuttering during heavy navigation. While the device excels at content consumption within the Amazon ecosystem and boasts fast browsing via the "Silk" browser, it lacks a camera, GPS, and microphone, limiting its functionality compared to more versatile tablets.

Ars Technica's review of the 2011 Kindle Fire highlights a $199 price point that makes it a compelling media-consumption device, despite failing to compete with premium tablets like the iPad in responsiveness. The device features a vibrant 7-inch display and good battery life, though it suffers from a poorly placed power button and text-doubling issues at certain angles. Software performance is described as "pokey," with the Silk browser underperforming and the user interface experiencing significant lag.

Wired’s 2011 review described the original Amazon Kindle Fire as a "fiendishly effective shopping portal" masquerading as a 7-inch tablet, giving it a 5/10 rating due to mixed performance. While praised for solid, paperback-like hardware and excellent video consumption, the device was criticized for lacking essential features like a camera, microphone, 3G, and expandable storage. The Silk web browser was found to be "preternaturally slow," contradicting Amazon’s cloud-acceleration claims, and the user interface felt sluggish with "jerky" transitions. Furthermore, reviewers noted the 1024x600 screen was too small for heavy tablet use, and the lack of physical volume buttons hampered navigation. Despite these flaws, the $200 price point made it a compelling, high-value entry point for consuming Amazon content, even if it failed to be a true "iPad killer". The review concluded that consumers might be better off waiting for a more polished second-generation model to address these significant software and hardware limitations.

The TechRadar review of the original 7-inch Amazon Kindle Fire praises it as a "spectacular" value-for-money device offering solid build quality and a user-friendly, media-focused interface. Key strengths include the innovative, fast-loading Silk browser and deep integration with Amazon's content ecosystem. However, the tablet suffers from limited 8GB storage without expansion, erratic performance, and a lack of features like Bluetooth, GPS, and a camera. Battery life was also a drawback, delivering only 5-6 hours of active use rather than the advertised eight. Finally, the device is criticized for being too restrictive for power users, lacking access to the official Android Market and treating non-media functions as secondary.

The Amazon Kindle Fire serves as a budget-conscious media consumption device, offering a high-quality IPS display with excellent brightness for reading and video streaming at a disruptive $199 price point. Its primary strength is seamless integration with Amazon’s ecosystem for accessing books, movies, and music. However, the tablet experiences significant performance limitations, including a sluggish interface and choppy performance due to limited hardware capability. The design lacks physical volume buttons, a camera, and expandable storage, limiting its utility for power users. Ultimately, the device's locked-down version of Android excludes the Google Play Store and hampers versatility compared to higher-end tablets. It is positioned as an ideal, affordable media slate for Amazon Prime members rather than a functional productivity tool. Copy

The IGN review of the 1st Generation Amazon Kindle Fire describes the $199 device as a "no-frills," budget-conscious tablet that focuses on value, featuring a sturdy 7-inch IPS display and a dual-core processor. While praised for its, price-to-performance ratio, the design was deemed uninspired with a plain matte plastic finish and a poorly placed power button. Key pros include deep integration with Amazon’s ecosystem for media consumption, an intuitive interface for shopping, and impressive battery life lasting around 7.5 to 9 hours. Conversely, significant cons center on performance and hardware, with the user experience hampered by a slow interface and the Silk browser failing to deliver on promised speeds. Hardware limitations noted in the review include the absence of a camera, no expandable storage, and a lack of physical volume buttons, necessitating on-screen adjustments. Ultimately, despite these flaws, the device was recommended as a, "dirt cheap" option for basic, Amazon-centric entertainment needs. Copy

The original 2011 Amazon Kindle Fire review by PCMag highlights the device as a disruptive, budget-friendly $199 tablet with a bright 7-inch IPS display and excellent integration into the Amazon ecosystem. Key pros include its low price, solid build quality, and an easy-to-use interface, earning it an Editors' Choice award as a superior media consumption device for the price. PCMag UKHowever, the tablet features significant cons, including sluggish performance, lack of a camera or microphone, and no GPS. The experience is further limited by restricted access to the Amazon Appstore rather than the full Android market, along with, at the time of review, a lack of comprehensive parental controls. Ultimately, PCMag concludes that despite its hardware limitations compared to higher-end rivals, the Kindle Fire is an "indisputable bargain" for users focused on media. It successfully challenged the tablet market by providing a functional, premium-feeling content viewer at a very low cost. PCMag UK

In a 2011 hands-on review, The Verge described the $199 Amazon Kindle Fire as a disruptive, solid-feeling tablet with an impressive 7-inch IPS display for its price point. While praised for its, design, the device lacks cameras, GPS, expandable storage, and physical volume buttons. The heavily customized Android interface seamlessly integrates Amazon’s ecosystem but can feel sluggish, making it an excellent media consumption device rather than a direct iPad competitor.

In a 2011 review for The Verge, Joshua Topolsky calls the $200 Amazon Kindle Fire a "terrific," budget-friendly device, but notes it is not an iPad-killer. Key pros include a solid build and deep, elegant integration with Amazon’s content ecosystem for movies, books, and music. However, the 7-inch tablet suffers from a clunky user interface with an oversensitive, unpolished, and sometimes sluggish interface. Furthermore, the Silk browser failed to deliver promised speed improvements, and the device lacks the high-end performance of competitors, making it a content-consumption tool rather than a versatile tablet, according to the review.