NVIDIA GeForce MX130 Análisis | 118 Datos comparados

LaptopMedia's review of the NVIDIA GeForce MX130 highlights its role as an entry-level, budget-friendly GPU, showing performance nearly identical to the older 940MX but 16% slower than the MX150, necessitating 768p resolution for most gaming tests. While it acts as a step up from integrated graphics for ultra-portable laptops and runs optimized titles like CS:GO and FIFA 18 well, its limitations are severe, requiring low settings for demanding titles. The main cons include outdated 28nm Maxwell architecture, causing it to lag behind newer, more efficient configurations. Ultimately, the MX130 offers playable frame rates in heavy, modern AAA titles, such as Ghost Recon: Wildlands, only when utilizing the lowest graphical presets.

The PCGameBenchmark review of the NVIDIA GeForce MX130 evaluates the mobile graphics card's real-world gaming capabilities by collecting performance data from a panel of over 90,000 users. The review relies on specific internal components paired with the GPU, such as an Intel Core i3-8130U, i5-8265U, or i5-10210U CPU, alongside system memory configurations varying from 8 GB to 24 GB of RAM. Tested games highlight the entry-level nature of this chip, featuring performance metrics for titles like Minecraft, Roblox, Bopl Battle, Lethal Company, FIFA 19, and Buckshot Roulette. The primary pro highlighted by the performance data is its ability to handle casual, less demanding titles and indie games quite well; for instance, it achieves a smooth average of 77 to 94 FPS in Bopl Battle and a playable 47 FPS in FIFA 19 when paired with an Intel Core i5 processor. However, a major con is its heavily inconsistent framerate and struggles with modern indie hits. The card drops to a choppy average of 27 to 39 FPS in Lethal Company and a sluggish 28 FPS in Buckshot Roulette. Even in...

The NVIDIA GeForce MX150 is the superior card, outperforming the MX130 by up to 44% in synthetic tests like Fire Strike and Unigine, thanks to its 14nm Pascal architecture compared to the older 28nm Maxwell in the MX130. The MX150 features higher clock speeds (up to 1532 MHz) and superior efficiency at 25W, whereas the MX130 runs at lower speeds with higher 30W power consumption. Pros for the MX150 include superior frame rates, modern features, and lower power consumption, though it remains limited to entry-level gaming. Conversely, the MX130 is a cost-effective option for basic, ultra-portable laptops, but suffers from inferior performance and an aging architecture.