Apple M1 Ultra Análisis | 78 Datos comparados

Rene Ritchie’s analysis of the M1 Ultra highlights that while UltraFusion architecture delivers exceptional, near-linear GPU scaling in high-load scenarios, many standard benchmarks fail to trigger these gains, creating misleading, sub-par results. The core strength, or pro, lies in its massive efficiency and performance gains for heavy tasks, whereas the "ugly truth" is that, as a con, lighter or improperly optimized workloads often show no improvement over the M1 Max. Ultimately, the review identifies the chip as a specialized tool for high-end professional workflows, noting that for general, daily use, the high cost of the M1 Ultra offers severely diminishing returns compared to cheaper alternatives. For more details, visit reneritchie.net. Copy

An ExtremeTech review highlights that the Apple M1 Ultra dominates Intel x86 architecture in computational fluid dynamics (CFD), utilizing NASA’s USM3D code to demonstrate superior performance. A major advantage, or pro, is its ability to match a 28-core Intel Xeon with just six threads, driven by 800 GB/s bandwidth that eliminates data bottlenecks. However, the M1 Ultra faces cons regarding thread management, as engaging efficiency cores (E-cores) can reduce peak performance, and inter-die communication increases CPU load. While excelling at efficiency and high-bandwidth tasks, the M1 Ultra's performance dominance is highly dependent on software optimization and workload specificity.

The M1 Ultra in the Mac Studio delivers exceptional performance for specialized video workflows and heavy-duty rendering, outperforming high-end PC workstations while remaining remarkably quiet and cool. It effectively combines two M1 Max chips to excel in multi-core tasks, yet it offers limited advantages for single-core tasks like photo editing, where it performs closely to the cheaper M1 Max. While a notable engineering achievement for specific professionals, the GPU gains are more modest (40-80%) than CPU gains, and the high entry cost may not be justified for general professional use or gaming. 9

Scott Simmons' ProVideo Coalition review identifies the Mac Studio with M1 Ultra as a potential "ultimate machine" for video editors, highlighting its compact, quiet design and extensive connectivity options like 10 GB Ethernet and multiple Thunderbolt 4 ports as major pros. The machine excels at handling intensive, optimized post-production tasks—including 8K video streams and visual effects—while maintaining low thermal levels through an efficient, quiet cooling system. However, cons include subtle fan noise in quiet environments, limited performance gains over the cheaper M1 Max for standard tasks, and the Studio Display's lack of high-dynamic-range (HDR) support for professional color grading.

The ZDNET review describes the Apple Mac Studio (M1 Ultra) as a compact, workstation-class desktop bridging the gap between the Mac mini and Mac Pro, ideal for creative professionals. It delivers immense power with exceptional thermal efficiency, allowing it to remain quiet under heavy loads, while providing extensive front and rear connectivity options. However, the machine offers zero post-purchase internal upgradability for RAM or storage and carries a high maximum configuration cost.

Engadget's review highlights the M1 Ultra as a powerful chip for creative professionals, utilizing "UltraFusion" to connect two M1 Max dies for 20 CPU and 64 GPU cores. Benchmarks show superior performance in video rendering and AI tasks, with the chip processing 8K video roughly twice as fast as a high-end PC with an RTX 3080 Ti. While efficient, the system faces, at times, software limitations, bugs, and high costs that make it overkill for general users.

The PCMag review highlights the Apple Mac Studio with M1 Ultra as a groundbreaking, compact workstation that delivers exceptional performance for creative professionals, utilizing "UltraFusion" technology to combine two M1 Max dies. Key advantages include its immense processing power—noted for rapidly completing tasks like Blender rendering—alongside a generous port selection, including multiple Thunderbolt 4 and USB-A ports, and a very quiet, compact design. However, the machine faces significant drawbacks, such as its high starting price of $3,999 and the complete lack of user-upgradable memory or storage. Additional cons include the required purchase of separate peripherals, such as the Studio Display, and limited, non-upgradable hardware, making it a locked-in, high-cost investment for power users.

The Verge reviews the Apple Mac Studio as a high-performance desktop that bridges the gap between the Mac Mini and Mac Pro, offering immense power in a compact form factor with excellent front-facing ports and quiet operation. While the M1 Ultra chip delivers workstation-level CPU performance that often beats competitors, the review notes the 64-core GPU does not outperform a dedicated NVIDIA RTX 3090, contrary to some expectations, and performance scaling is inconsistent. Major drawbacks include a complete lack of upgradability with soldered storage and memory, along with a high cost for top-tier configurations. For more details, visit The Verge.

The PCMag review highlights that the M1 Ultra, featuring two fused M1 Max dies, offers double the core counts for significantly higher multi-core performance, reducing rendering times by nearly half in tests like Blender. While providing superior workstation power, the Ultra shares the same single-core performance as the Max and actually falls behind in some web-based tasks (JetStream 2). Furthermore, the review notes a $1,400–$2,000 price premium and a 2-pound weight increase due to a copper heatsink, positioning the M1 Max as better for general use and the Ultra for, specifically, heavily parallelized creative workflows. For the full, detailed review, visit PCMag.

The Apple Mac Studio with M1 Ultra, reviewed by PCMag, is a compact workstation offering immense performance through its 20-core CPU and up to 64-core GPU. It features an extensive array of connectivity, including multiple Thunderbolt 4 ports and an SDXC card slot, while maintaining "whisper-quiet" operation under heavy creative loads. A major advantage is the incredible processing power, ideal for video editors and 3D designers. However, a significant drawback is the complete lack of user-upgradability for RAM and internal SSD storage, requiring users to finalize configurations at the time of purchase. Priced as a premium workstation starting at $3,999, it is targeted at professionals, particularly because it does not include a display, keyboard, or mouse. Despite the cost and non-upgradable design, it is recognized for its unmatched power-to-size ratio. Copy